<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweaking our Backlog Review Meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kfurlong.com/2010/04/01/tweaking-our-backlog-review-meeting-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kfurlong.com/2010/04/01/tweaking-our-backlog-review-meeting-2/</link>
	<description>A blog about agile development, quality management, business, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharta</title>
		<link>http://www.kfurlong.com/2010/04/01/tweaking-our-backlog-review-meeting-2/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kfurlong.com/?p=139#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Variable team capacity during a sprint is a big problem with sprint planning. It essentially invalidates the use of velocity for sprint planning. We had this problem too, which is when we dropped sprint planning and transitioned into a pure pull system. 

The same system worked for prioritization too. With a pull system, the only call that needs to be made it Now, Later or Never. You don&#039;t really need to stack rank everything. So at the time of pulling, you can calculate the estimate with the most up to date data, and then decide whether this is a Now, or Later, or Never. That essentially eliminates the need to groom the backlog estimates and keep them up to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Variable team capacity during a sprint is a big problem with sprint planning. It essentially invalidates the use of velocity for sprint planning. We had this problem too, which is when we dropped sprint planning and transitioned into a pure pull system. </p>
<p>The same system worked for prioritization too. With a pull system, the only call that needs to be made it Now, Later or Never. You don&#8217;t really need to stack rank everything. So at the time of pulling, you can calculate the estimate with the most up to date data, and then decide whether this is a Now, or Later, or Never. That essentially eliminates the need to groom the backlog estimates and keep them up to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

